Review Panel data

On this page

Total applications referred to the Review Panel

5 September 2024 to 31 August 2025

 

Residential

Residential

Community

All

(not currently in residential care)

(already in residential care)

 

(total)

Referrals

128

42

54

224

Endorsed

90

26

38

154

Endorsed %

70%

62%

70%

69%

Not endorsed

38

16

16

70

Not endorsed %

30%

38%

30%

31%

Referrals

This Table shows the total referrals to the Review Panel to the end of August 2025. It includes the numbers and rates of referrals that have been endorsed or not endorsed.

Referrals that are not endorsed either needed to supply more information to support the referral, or the Review Panel wasn’t satisfied eligibility criteria had been met, based on the information provided.

This doesn’t necessarily represent a final decision. NASCs and EGL sites can resubmit with further information or evidence, as required. Many of those not endorsed are subsequently endorsed after resubmitting.

Total applications referred to the Review Panel by month

 

Referrals considered

Referrals endorsed

Not endorsed / more information requested

Sept-25

25

13

12

Oct-24

10

9

1

Nov-24

16

8

8

Dec-24

24

22

2

Jan-25

21

16

5

Feb-25

21

16

5

Mar-25

8

5

3

Apr-25

16

11

5

May-25

12

7

5

Jun-25

28

16

12

Jul-25

20

11

9

Aug-25

23

20

3

TOTAL

224

154

70

Total referrals not endorsed – by primary reason

Referrals that are not endorsed either needed to supply more information to support the referral or the Review Panel wasn’t satisfied eligibility criteria had been met, based on the information provided.

This doesn’t necessarily represent a final decision. NASCs and EGL sites can resubmit with further information or evidence, as required.

Not endorsed category

Number

Outside of Review ToR

15

Further clarification or information required, cannot determine changed requirements

28

Resubmission – Review pane requirements still not met

7

Funding contributions from other agencies needs to be determined

11

No needs assessment or incorrect pricing tool provided

5

Out-of-date information provided

4

TOTAL

70

 

More information

Find out more about the Review Panel in our fact sheet.